PUID: 63 || PLAB 2 Mock 6 :: ChildAbuse1: Boyfriend NAI
- examiner mla
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read
Summary
This scenario involves a 4-month-old infant presenting with a spiral fracture, raising concern for non-accidental injury (NAI). The focus is on safe clinical assessment, safeguarding, escalation, and avoiding assumptions.
Key Points
Clinical Presentation (Orthopaedics / Paediatrics)
Spiral fracture in an infant → highly suspicious injury
Mechanism: requires twisting force, uncommon in accidental injury
Associated with possible abuse or safeguarding concern
Must consider:
Trauma / fall history
Bone disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta)
Bleeding disorders
Safeguarding & Risk Assessment
Never make assumptions about cause or perpetrator
Focus on:
Who was caring for the child
Timeline of events
Family dynamics
Assess:
Biological vs non-biological caregivers
Home environment
Any history of violence or criminal background (indirect questioning)
Professional Responsibility
As an FY2:
Do NOT make independent safeguarding decisions
Escalate immediately to seniors
Follow legal safeguarding protocols
Duty aligned with GMC Good Medical Practice:
Protect vulnerable patients
Act on concerns promptly
History Taking Essentials
Presenting complaint:
Onset, duration, progression of swelling
Pain, irritability
Mechanism:
Any fall or trauma
Supervision:
Who was caring for the child at the time?
Social history:
Caregivers, relationships, employment
Past history:
Birth history
Development
Vaccinations
Previous injuries
Red flags:
Behavioural changes (fear, irritability, withdrawal)
Exploring Non-Accidental Injury (NAI)
Use indirect, non-accusatory questioning
Example:
“Can you tell me who usually looks after Timothy?”
“Has anything unusual happened recently?”
Avoid statements like:
“Could it be your boyfriend?” ❌
Important Considerations
DO NOT make assumptions (critical error)
Always:
Escalate to seniors
Involve safeguarding team
Document thoroughly
Maintain:
Neutral tone
Child safety as priority
Admission required until safeguarding clearance
Diagnostic Approach
Initial Assessment
ABCDE (if acute)
Pain assessment
Focused History
Injury mechanism
Timeline
Caregiver details
Examination
Full physical exam (look for:
Bruises
Multiple injuries
Signs of neglect)
Investigations
X-ray (confirm fracture)
Skeletal survey (if NAI suspected)
Blood tests:
Coagulation profile
Bone profile
Genetic testing if indicated
Safeguarding Assessment
Multidisciplinary team involvement
Management
Immediate
Admit child to hospital
Provide adequate analgesia
Immobilise fracture
Specialist Input
Orthopaedic referral:
Casting vs surgery
Paediatric review
Safeguarding
Inform:
Seniors
Safeguarding team / social services
Legal obligation to report
Do NOT discharge until cleared
Documentation
Record:
Full history
Exact words used by caregiver
Examination findings
Actions taken
Essential for legal purposes
Follow-Up
Review in ~2 weeks
Ongoing safeguarding input
Communication Skills
Use:
Calm, non-judgmental tone
Simple language
Key phrases:
“My responsibility is to ensure Timothy’s safety”
“We need to involve specialists to understand this better”
Avoid:
Blame or accusations
Show empathy:
Acknowledge distress
Allow questions
Maintain eye contact, supportive body language
📌 Avoid over-rehearsed phrases and artificial empathy
Ethical Considerations
Child protection overrides confidentiality
Duty of care:
Protect vulnerable child
Maintain:
Professional integrity
Non-judgmental approach
Follow safeguarding laws and GMC guidance
📚 Additional Resources
GMC: Good Medical Practice (Safeguarding duties)
PLAB 2 Examiner Top Tips
GMC Examiner Common Errors Guide




Comments