PLAB 2 Mock Test Feedback :: 13/03/25 :: Paduhwan 30 :: Cases 11-16
- examiner mla
- Mar 14
- 23 min read
Updated: Jul 20
Case 11:
Paediatrics Symptomatic Differentials
2 Years Infuenza Vaccination
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
In this scenario, you are an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery, and you will be seeing Mrs. Danielle Brown, a 30-year-old mother who is concerned about her 3-year-old son's upcoming flu vaccine.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
The Domain-wise evaluation shows areas where you did well and others where you have room to grow.
A "Yes" means you covered that point effectively
A "Partial" indicates that you did some of it well but missed some key details.
A "No" means there was an important opportunity that wasn’t addressed.
Don’t worry if you see several areas marked "No" or "Partial"—this is common and simply highlights where you can focus your learning.
By reflecting on these areas and practicing, you’ll be able to improve and feel more confident in your consultations. Remember, every bit of feedback is an opportunity to grow, and you’re on the right path by taking these steps.
Timestamps are provided to show exactly when during the consultation you covered or missed key points. Reviewing these can help you see how well you're managing your time and where you might need to be more efficient in addressing important areas.
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Confirm the patient's full name and age: Mrs. Danielle Brown, 30 years old | 2:54 | No | You confirmed the full name as Daniel Brown but did not confirm the age. In future, make sure to verify both name and age, as it is important for proper identification. |
Data Gathering | Establish reasons for visit and concerns about the flu vaccine | 3:08 | Yes | You effectively asked about the reason for the visit and elicited the concern regarding the flu vaccine. Good job. |
Data Gathering | Ask about the child's current condition: any fever, flu symptoms, diarrhea, or vomiting | - | No | You did not ask about the child’s current health condition, including fever, flu symptoms, diarrhea, or vomiting. This is crucial to assess if the child is currently unwell, which could influence vaccination decisions. Try to include this in future cases. |
Data Gathering | Inquire about pregnancy and birth history, vaccination history, development history, past medical history, drug history, and allergies | 4:03, 4:14, 4:23, 4:42, 4:53, 5:00 | Partial | You asked about birth history, vaccination history, development, and allergies but missed past medical history and drug history. These are important to ensure there are no contraindications or relevant risk factors for vaccination. Next time, ensure to ask specifically about past illnesses and any medications Rick has taken. |
Data Gathering | Confirm Danielle’s understanding of the flu vaccine and address specific concerns | 7:02, 8:03 | Yes | You asked if the patient knew what the flu vaccine does and clarified that it does not cause fits. Well done on addressing her concerns directly. |
Data Gathering | Rule out contraindications for the flu vaccine (e.g., severe asthma, allergies to neomycin or eggs, low immune system) | - | No | You asked about general allergies but did not specifically rule out contraindications like severe asthma, allergy to neomycin or eggs, or low immune system. In future, explicitly screen for these contraindications before recommending the vaccine. |
Management | Educate about the flu vaccine which contains a weakened virus that cannot cause severe infection and cannot multiply in the body | - | No | You reassured the patient but did not explicitly mention that the flu vaccine contains a weakened virus that cannot multiply or cause severe infection. Be sure to include this next time. |
Management | Explain that it is a single dose administered nasally and is completely safe | - | No | You did not mention that it is a single dose and administered nasally. This information helps reassure the parent about the ease of administration. |
Management | Highlight that the vaccine protects against the flu and that symptoms post-vaccination are mild compared to a normal flu infection | 7:10 | Yes | You explained that the vaccine prevents flu and emphasized that flu itself can lead to more serious complications. Well done. |
Management | Clarify that the flu vaccine does not cause fits and there is no evidence supporting a link to such severe reactions | 8:03 | Yes | You clearly stated that research does not show a link between the flu vaccine and seizures. Good job. |
Management | Discuss the potential mild side effects like runny or blocked nose, headache, general tiredness, and loss of appetite, which typically last for 2-3 days | 8:38 | Partial | You mentioned mild fever and irritation but did not cover headache, tiredness, or appetite loss. In future, list all common side effects so the parent knows what to expect. |
Management | Explain the importance of the flu vaccine in preventing complications such as pneumonia, bronchitis, and ear infections | - | No | You explained the general benefit of preventing flu but did not mention specific complications like pneumonia, bronchitis, or ear infections. Including these details would strengthen your argument. |
Management | Provide reassurance about the safety and necessity of the vaccine | 7:32, 8:17 | Yes | You provided strong reassurance and addressed parental concerns effectively. Well done. |
Management | Offer a leaflet about the flu vaccine and the immunization schedule | 9:44 | Yes | You mentioned giving a leaflet and directing the parent to the NHS website. This is excellent patient education. |
Management | Explain that while the vaccine is not compulsory, it is highly advisable for the child's health and the health of others in the community | 10:35 | Yes | You explained that while it is not compulsory, it is recommended for protection. Well done. |
Management | Encourage Danielle to return if she has further concerns or if the child experiences any severe symptoms | 9:55 | Yes | You advised her to return if there were any concerning symptoms. Good job. |
Interpersonal Skills | Acknowledge Danielle’s concerns and validate her feelings | 5:27 | Yes | You acknowledged her concerns about her neighbor’s child and reassured her. This was well done. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use empathetic phrases like, 'I understand your worries,' and 'It’s normal to be concerned about vaccinations' | 5:29 | Yes | You used empathetic language, such as "I understand where you’re coming from," which is great. |
Interpersonal Skills | Summarize the discussion to ensure understanding | - | No | You did not summarize the key points before ending the consultation. Summarizing helps reinforce important information and checks patient understanding. Make sure to include a brief summary next time. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use simple language and avoid medical jargon | 7:02, 8:03 | Yes | You explained things clearly in a way the patient could understand. Well done. |
Interpersonal Skills | Encourage questions and provide clear, concise answers | 7:58 | Yes | You invited questions and answered them directly. This is good communication. |
Interpersonal Skills | Show patience and understanding | 5:53 | Yes | You listened carefully and did not rush the patient. Well done. |
Interpersonal Skills | Create a supportive environment to make Danielle feel heard and respected | 5:29 | Yes | Your approach was respectful, which helped build trust with the patient. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Disorganised / unstructured consultation | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | ||
Management | Does not develop a management plan reflecting current best practice | ✔️ |
Rapport | Does not appear to develop rapport or show sensitivity for the patient’s feelings and concerns | ✔️ |
Listening | ||
Language | Does not use language or explanations that are relevant and understandable to the patient | ✔️ |
Time |
Case 12:
Medicine Symptomatic Differentials
Acute Gout
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
You are an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery, and your patient is Unity Brown, a 54-year-old lady presenting with sudden pain in her right big toe. She has a history of hay fever and hypertension, for which she takes cetirizine and bendroflumethiazide, respectively. She is a smoker and consumes alcohol regularly. Her main concern is the severe pain and swelling in her toe, which is affecting her ability to work as a taxi driver.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Confirm patient identifiers: full name and age | 1:47-1:50 | Yes | You did well in confirming the patient’s full name and age early in the consultation. |
Data Gathering | Acknowledge and validate patient's emotions before proceeding | 2:14, 2:30, 3:27 | Partial | You showed some empathy by saying "sorry about that" multiple times, but a more structured validation, such as "I can see how distressing this must be for you," would have been better. Try to explicitly acknowledge feelings before diving into questions. |
Data Gathering | Use SOCRATES for presenting complaint: Site, Onset, Character, Radiation, Associated symptoms, Timing, Exacerbating/Relieving factors, Severity | 2:16-3:27 | Partial | You covered most elements but did not explicitly ask about Radiation and Associated Symptoms beyond fever. Next time, ensure all components are addressed. |
Data Gathering | Rule out trauma: Ask about any recent injury to the toe | 3:54 | Yes | You asked about recent trauma, which was good. |
Data Gathering | Consider gout: Inquire about swelling, redness, and previous episodes | 3:46-4:08 | Partial | You asked about previous episodes but did not specifically ask about swelling and redness. Next time, directly inquire about these symptoms. |
Data Gathering | Consider rheumatoid arthritis: Ask about morning stiffness | N/A | No | You did not ask about morning stiffness. This is important in differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from other joint conditions. |
Data Gathering | Consider osteoarthritis: Ask if pain worsens by the end of the day | N/A | No | You did not ask about worsening pain in the evening. A simple, “Does the pain get worse as the day progresses?” would help rule out osteoarthritis. |
Data Gathering | Consider septic arthritis: Ask about recent fever or steroid use | 3:51-3:54 | Partial | You asked about fever but did not inquire about steroid use, which is crucial for assessing immunosuppression and risk of infection. |
Data Gathering | Conduct systemic review using PMAFTOSA: Past medical history, Medication history, Allergic history, Family history, Travel history, Occupational history, Social history, Alcohol and smoking | 4:11-6:11 | Partial | You covered most aspects but missed travel and family history. Family history is especially relevant for conditions like gout and autoimmune diseases. |
Data Gathering | Explore ICE: Ideas, Concerns, Expectations | 7:18-7:31 | Partial | You asked about concerns and expectations but did not explore the patient’s own ideas about the condition. Next time, explicitly ask, “What do you think might be causing this?” |
Management | Provisional diagnosis: Likely gout | 6:51 | Yes | You identified gout as the most likely diagnosis, which was appropriate. |
Management | Explain gout: Arthritis caused by high uric acid levels leading to crystal formation in joints | 7:01-7:15 | Yes | Your explanation was clear. |
Management | Identify risk factors: Hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, diet, and lifestyle | 5:28-6:11 | Yes | You effectively identified these risk factors. Well done! |
Management | Start treatment: Colchicine and NSAIDs (e.g., Ibuprofen), Paracetamol if needed | 8:22-8:29 | Partial | You prescribed diclofenac but did not mention colchicine or paracetamol as alternative options. Ensure you provide full treatment choices. |
Management | Plan follow-up: Review in 4-6 weeks for blood tests and BMI monitoring | 9:03-9:10 | Partial | You mentioned a follow-up, but it was in two weeks rather than 4-6 weeks. Also, you did not mention BMI monitoring. Ensure to align with best practices. |
Management | Consider changing hypertension medication to a calcium channel blocker | 8:44-9:03 | Partial | You identified that bendroflumethiazide may be contributing to gout but did not explicitly state switching to a calcium channel blocker. This should have been clearly recommended. |
Management | Provide general advice: Rest, elevate limb, avoid alcohol, keep joint cool, use ice packs | N/A | No | You did not provide any lifestyle advice on rest, elevation, or ice packs. |
Management | Advise lifestyle changes: Reduce alcohol, stop smoking, lose weight, balanced diet, exercise | 5:28-6:11 | Partial | You asked about lifestyle but did not counsel on reducing alcohol, stopping smoking, or diet changes. Providing specific advice here would have been beneficial. |
Management | Safety netting: Return if severe joint pain, fever, or general unwellness develops | N/A | No | You did not provide safety netting. Always tell the patient when to seek urgent help. |
Management | Provide educational materials: Leaflet about gout | N/A | No | No mention of an educational leaflet. Try to include this next time. |
Management | Summarize discussion and confirm understanding | 8:50 | Partial | You checked understanding briefly, but a structured recap of key points would have been more effective. |
Management | Address any further expectations from the patient | N/A | No | You did not ask, “Is there anything else you were expecting from today’s consultation?” This would ensure patient-centered care. |
Interpersonal Skills | Ensure thorough history taking and physical examination | 6:13-6:32 | Partial | Your history was thorough but missed key differential questions. You also mentioned examination but did not describe findings. |
Interpersonal Skills | Address patient’s concerns and expectations effectively | 7:25-7:31 | Partial | You asked about concerns but did not explore all expectations. Try asking, “What were you hoping we could do today?” |
Interpersonal Skills | Provide clear and concise explanations of the diagnosis and management plan | 7:01-7:15 | Yes | Your explanation of gout was clear. Well done! |
Interpersonal Skills | Maintain clear communication throughout the consultation | Throughout | Yes | You maintained a good flow of conversation. |
Interpersonal Skills | Provide patient-centered care, ensuring the patient feels heard and understood | 3:27, 5:22, 7:25 | Partial | You showed some empathy but could have been more explicit in addressing emotions and expectations. |
Interpersonal Skills | Ensure safety netting and appropriate follow-up are clearly communicated | N/A | No | You did not provide proper safety netting. Always inform the patient when to seek urgent care. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Disorganised / unstructured consultation | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | ||
Management | Does not develop a management plan reflecting current best practice | ✔️ |
Rapport | Does not appear to develop rapport or show sensitivity for the patient’s feelings and concerns | ✔️ |
Listening | ||
Language | Does not use language or explanations that are relevant and understandable to the patient | ✔️ |
Time |
Case 13:
Dermatology Symptomatic Differentials
Psoriasis
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
You are an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery. Your patient, Darlene Litterman, is a 35-year-old woman presenting with a rash on her knees and elbows. She has been experiencing this rash for about 6 weeks, and it has not improved despite using petroleum jelly and some creams from the pharmacy. The rash is red with white patches, mildly itchy, and sore. Darlene is generally healthy, has no significant past medical or family history, and is currently stressed due to being jobless.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Confirm the patient's full name and age. | 0:09 | Yes | You asked for and confirmed the patient's full name and age. Good start. |
Data Gathering | Ask about the onset, duration, and progression of the rash. | 0:44, 1:16 | Yes | You asked about how long the rash had been present and its progression. Well done. |
Data Gathering | Inquire about previous episodes, site, and appearance changes. | 1:06, 1:29, 1:49 | Yes | You asked about previous episodes, site, and some aspects of appearance. Great work. |
Data Gathering | Explore aggravating/precipitating factors (stress, infections, contact history). | 1:24, 5:43 | Partial | You asked about what makes it worse but didn't explore stress, infections, or contact history. Make sure to cover these explicitly. |
Data Gathering | Discuss relieving factors and treatments tried. | 6:20 | Yes | You inquired about treatments the patient had tried. Good job. |
Data Gathering | Assess associated symptoms (local and systemic). | 1:35, 2:05 | Yes | You asked about itchiness and systemic symptoms like fever. Well covered. |
Data Gathering | Perform a full systems review (CVS, RS, CNS, GIT, GU, Eyes, MSK). | 2:41, 2:45, 2:50, 2:53 | Partial | You covered MSK (joints), eyes, and GU but missed CVS, RS, GIT, and CNS. A more structured review is needed. |
Data Gathering | Check past medical, medication, allergic history, and family history. | 3:15, 3:20, 5:14 | Yes | You asked about medical history, medications, allergies, and family history. Good work. |
Data Gathering | Investigate psychosocial aspects (stress, smoking, alcohol, diet, exercise, home and work situation). | 3:01, 3:50 | Partial | You covered smoking, alcohol, and work but missed stress, diet, exercise, and home situation. These are key in dermatology cases. |
Data Gathering | Understand patient's ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE). | 6:26, 6:32, 6:49 | Yes | You asked about the patient's concerns and expectations. Well done. |
Data Gathering | Lesion Description: SCLEDERMA - Size, Color, Location, Elevation, Relation to other structures, Other symptoms, Duration, Edges, Recurrence, Morphology, Additional findings. | 1:49, 1:56, 2:16 | Partial | You covered size, color, location, and elevation but missed edges, recurrence, and relation to other structures. |
Data Gathering | Symptoms: Any other lesions on any other part of the body. | — | No | You didn't ask if the patient had lesions on other body parts. Make sure to cover this. |
Data Gathering | Systemic symptoms: Any fever, weakness, weight loss. | 2:05 | Partial | You asked about fever but didn't ask about weakness or weight loss. Always complete the systemic inquiry. |
Management | Explain Diagnosis: Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition causing flaky patches and scales. | 4:25 | Partial | You mentioned psoriasis but didn't explain it clearly as a chronic condition with scaling. Ensure the patient fully understands the condition. |
Management | Discuss risk factors: Genetics, immune system disorders, infections, stress, obesity, smoking, alcohol, vitamin D deficiency, medications, weather, hormonal changes. | 5:14 | Partial | You touched on genetics and possible triggers but didn't comprehensively discuss all risk factors. |
Management | Offer symptomatic treatments: Emollients, potent topical corticosteroids, vitamin D preparations, topical salicylic acid. | 6:07 | Partial | You mentioned ointments but didn't specify corticosteroids or vitamin D preparations. Always name treatments to ensure clarity. |
Management | Provide lifestyle advice: Quit smoking, limit alcohol, manage weight, reduce stress. | — | No | You didn't provide lifestyle advice on smoking, alcohol, weight, or stress. These are crucial in psoriasis management. |
Management | Arrange follow-up in 4 weeks to assess treatment response. | 7:12 | No | You offered a two-week follow-up instead of four. Ensure alignment with standard guidelines. |
Management | Advice on application: Emollients before other treatments, steroid and vitamin D preparations once daily at different times. | — | No | You didn’t explain the correct application sequence of treatments. Always clarify how to apply them. |
Management | Safety Netting: Contact GP if experiencing joint pain or swelling, inform about signs of severe psoriasis complications. | 7:19 | Partial | You mentioned coming back if symptoms worsen but didn't specifically discuss joint pain or complications of severe psoriasis. |
Management | Provide written information and resources about psoriasis (Psoriasis Association, British Association of Dermatologists, NHS patient leaflet). | 7:03 | Partial | You mentioned giving a leaflet but didn't specify reliable sources like NHS or BAD. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use open-ended questions and actively listen to the patient's concerns. | 0:44, 6:26 | Yes | You used open-ended questions and acknowledged concerns well. Good job. |
Interpersonal Skills | Provide clear and empathetic explanations about the condition and its management. | 4:25, 6:07 | Partial | Some explanations were unclear (e.g., psoriasis pathophysiology, treatment application). Aim for clarity and simplicity. |
Interpersonal Skills | Involve the patient in decision-making, ensuring they understand the treatment plan. | 6:12, 7:12 | Partial | You included the patient but didn’t fully explain all treatment options or their role in decision-making. Try to engage them more. |
Interpersonal Skills | Offer psychological support, acknowledging the stress related to joblessness. | — | No | You didn’t acknowledge the emotional impact of psoriasis, particularly work-related stress. Show empathy here. |
Interpersonal Skills | Encourage lifestyle changes positively, providing resources and support where needed. | — | No | You missed discussing lifestyle improvements for psoriasis. Encouraging self-care is important. |
Interpersonal Skills | Schedule a follow-up appointment to reassess the condition and treatment efficacy. | 7:12 | Partial | You scheduled a follow-up, but the duration was incorrect (two weeks instead of four). Stick to standard guidelines. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Disorganised / unstructured consultation | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | ||
Management | Does not develop a management plan reflecting current best practice | ✔️ |
Rapport | Does not appear to develop rapport or show sensitivity for the patient’s feelings and concerns | ✔️ |
Listening | ||
Language | Does not use language or explanations that are relevant and understandable to the patient | ✔️ |
Time |
Case 14:
Medicine Symptomatic Differentials
Guillian Barre Syndrome
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
You are an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery. Your patient, Sarah Harrison, is a 45-year-old woman presenting with progressive weakness in her legs and arms. She had an upper respiratory tract infection 2 weeks ago that resolved without antibiotics. Your task is to assess her condition and discuss initial management.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Patient identifiers: Confirm full name and age | 2:04 | Yes | You asked for the patient’s full name and age at the start. Well done. |
Data Gathering | Clarify presenting complaint: Ask about the nature and progression of weakness | 2:26, 2:37, 2:51, 3:04, 3:48 | Yes | You asked about the nature and progression of the weakness, including how it affects the patient. Good job! |
Data Gathering | Systemic review: Inquire about lightheadedness, dizziness, headaches, fever, cough, chest pain, palpitations, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, appetite, sensory loss, mobility, joint pain, and rashes | 3:27, 3:34, 3:57, 4:16, 4:26 | Partial | You asked about dizziness, fever, flu-like symptoms, and sensory loss, but you missed several important areas like headaches, cough, chest pain, palpitations, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, appetite, joint pain, and rashes. Try to ensure a more comprehensive review. |
Data Gathering | Differential diagnosis: Rule out multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, myasthenia gravis | 7:50 | Partial | You mentioned Guillain-Barre syndrome, but you did not explicitly rule out multiple sclerosis or myasthenia gravis. It would have been good to explore symptoms suggestive of these conditions. |
Data Gathering | Red flags: Check for respiratory issues, stroke symptoms, and spinal cord compression signs | 3:57, 8:30 | Partial | You asked about shortness of breath, which is good. However, you did not explicitly check for stroke symptoms (e.g., facial drooping, speech difficulties) or spinal cord compression signs (e.g., urinary retention, saddle anesthesia). These should have been explored. |
Data Gathering | PMAFTOSA: Past medical history, family history, social history | 4:55, 6:21, 6:39, 6:46 | Partial | You covered past medical history and social history (smoking and alcohol), but family history was missing. Try to include this next time. |
Data Gathering | ICE: Ideas, concerns, expectations | 8:21, 8:40 | Partial | You addressed some concerns about the condition being scary, but you did not ask explicitly about the patient’s own ideas or expectations regarding the illness and treatment. This would have helped to gauge her understanding and address any misconceptions. |
Data Gathering | Effects of symptoms: Assess impact on daily life and activities | 6:21 | Yes | You asked about how the weakness affected her daily activities, such as work and driving. Good job! |
Data Gathering | Summary: Confirm understanding and completeness of information gathered | — | No | You did not summarize the key points of the history back to the patient to confirm completeness. Doing this ensures nothing important is missed. |
Management | Routine investigations: Perform blood tests (FBC, U&E, LFT, blood sugar, ESR, CRP) | 7:06 | Yes | You listed relevant blood tests, which was good. |
Management | Immediate action: Refer to hospital for neurology team admission | 8:30 | Yes | You appropriately referred the patient to the hospital. Well done! |
Management | Arrange transportation to hospital if needed | — | No | You did not discuss how she would get to the hospital. You could have asked if she had someone to take her or if an ambulance was needed. |
Management | Inform patient about possible treatments: Plasma exchange, immunoglobulin medication, steroids | — | No | You did not mention any treatment options. Providing this information would have reassured the patient and improved understanding. |
Management | Advise to stop driving and inform DVLA | 9:04 | Partial | You told the patient not to drive but did not mention the need to inform the DVLA, which is a legal requirement. Make sure to include this next time. |
Management | Consult with seniors for additional advice | — | No | You did not mention consulting a senior doctor. In complex cases like this, mentioning senior input would demonstrate good clinical judgment. |
Management | Patient education: Provide information leaflets about Guillain-Barre syndrome | — | No | You did not mention providing patient education materials. Patients benefit from written information they can review later. |
Management | Recap discussion to ensure patient understanding | — | No | You did not summarize the management plan back to the patient to ensure they understood everything. This is crucial for clarity. |
Management | Address any further questions or concerns | 9:16 | Partial | The patient asked how she could contact you, and you gave some information. However, you did not explicitly invite her to ask further questions about the condition or treatment. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use empathetic and clear language | 3:27, 8:40 | Partial | You showed some empathy, such as acknowledging the patient’s fear. However, when she expressed concern about the condition being scary, your response, "Yes, it's not scary, it's just the condition," could have been more reassuring. Try validating her concerns while providing reassurance. |
Interpersonal Skills | Ensure the patient feels heard and understood | 3:27 | Yes | You acknowledged her difficulties and repeated key points, showing active listening. |
Interpersonal Skills | Provide reassurance about the condition and treatment plan | 8:40 | Partial | You reassured her that referral was needed, but a more structured reassurance about prognosis and available treatments would have helped. |
Interpersonal Skills | Explain the necessity of hospital admission and further tests | 8:30 | Yes | You clearly explained why hospital admission was necessary. Good job! |
Interpersonal Skills | Encourage the patient to involve family support, such as calling her mother | — | No | You did not ask if she had someone for support. Encouraging her to involve a family member could have helped. |
Interpersonal Skills | Discuss the follow-up plan and next steps after hospital admission | — | No | You did not discuss what would happen after admission. A brief mention of possible follow-up with a neurologist would have been helpful. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Needs improvement in organizing safety-netting and psychological exploration. | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | Does not recognise the issues or priorities in the consultation (Missed key differentials, DVLA notification) | ✔️ |
Management | Does not develop a management plan reflecting current best practice (Missed treatment discussion, transportation, patient education) | ✔️ |
Rapport | ||
Listening | Does not make adequate use of verbal & non-verbal cues (Reassurance could have been stronger) | ✔️ |
Language | Does not use language or explanations that are relevant and understandable (Response to "Is it scary?" could have been more comforting) | ✔️ |
Time | Shows poor time management (Did not fully cover systemic review or summarization) | ✔️ |
Case 15:
Medical Ethics
LGBTQ Pap Smear
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
As an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery, you need to call Ellen Taylor, a 25-year-old woman, and address her concerns about a recently received invitation for a cervical smear screening.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Confirm Identity and Details: 'Hello, am I speaking with Miss. Ellen Taylor?' 'Could you please confirm your age and the first line of your address?' | 1:39, 2:25 | Yes | You confirmed the patient's identity and details effectively. Well done! |
Data Gathering | Check Communication: 'Can you hear me clearly?' 'Is this a good time to talk?' 'If this line gets disconnected can I call you back on this number?' | 0:06, 2:36 | Yes | You ensured that the patient could hear you and that this was a good time to talk. Great! |
Data Gathering | Acknowledge the patient's concerns empathetically: 'I understand that you have some concerns.' | 3:14 | Partial | You acknowledged the patient’s feelings but could have expressed more direct empathy with phrases like, 'I understand this might be concerning for you.' |
Data Gathering | Ask for permission to ask further questions to understand the confusion regarding the invitation for PAP smear. | 3:52 | Partial | You did ask for permission to ask personal questions, but it could have been framed more clearly in relation to the patient’s confusion about the smear test. |
Data Gathering | Sexual History: 'Are you sexually active?' 'Is your partner male or female?' 'What kind of sexual intercourse do you practice?' 'Have you ever been in a sexual relationship with a male partner?' 'Do you use any sex toys?' 'Do you share sex toys with your partner?' 'Have you ever been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection?' 'Have you had a pap smear before?' | 4:11, 4:23, 4:44 | Partial | You asked about sexual activity and sex toys but missed key details like STI history, previous Pap smears, and sharing of sex toys. Ensure to ask all relevant history comprehensively. |
Data Gathering | Check Understanding: 'What do you know about cervical smears or pap smears?' 'Do you know why it is usually offered?' | 3:26 | Yes | You asked about the patient's understanding, which is good practice. Well done! |
Management | Explain Pap Smear: It's a screening test offered in the UK to women aged 25-64 years. Done every 3 years until 49, then every 5 years from 50-64. It checks the health of the cervix and screens for pre-cancerous conditions to prevent cervical cancer. | 8:22 | Yes | You provided a clear explanation of the screening process, including frequency and purpose. Well done! |
Management | Explain HPV: Cervical cancer is usually caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted infection. HPV can be asymptomatic. There is an increased risk of HPV with male partners or sharing sex toys with female partners. | 6:03 | Partial | You mentioned HPV and transmission through sex toys but could have elaborated on it being asymptomatic and its role in cervical cancer. |
Management | Results Explanation: If HPV is positive but no abnormal cells, screening is done again in 1 year and again in 2 years if HPV persists. If HPV is positive and abnormal cells are found, a colposcopy is needed. If results are unclear, a repeat test in 3 months is required, known as an 'inadequate result.' | 7:18, 7:46 | Partial | You explained HPV testing and follow-up but did not mention the 3-month repeat for inadequate results. Ensure to cover all possible outcomes. |
Management | Safety Netting: Advise on what to do if she experiences any symptoms or has further questions. | - | No | You did not explicitly provide safety netting. Always reassure the patient and advise on when to seek further help. |
Management | Leaflets and Pamphlets: Offer informational leaflets about cervical screening and HPV. | - | No | You did not mention offering any written resources. Providing NHS leaflets would be useful. |
Management | Follow Up: Arrange a follow-up appointment if needed to discuss results or further concerns. | - | No | No mention of follow-up. Always offer a follow-up discussion for any concerns or test results. |
Interpersonal Skills | Communication: Maintain a calm, empathetic tone. Use simple, non-technical language. Allow the patient to express concerns and feelings. | 3:14, 5:06 | Partial | Your tone was mostly calm, but some explanations were overly technical (e.g., 'mouth of the womb'). Using simpler language and a more reassuring tone would help. |
Interpersonal Skills | Summarize the information given to ensure understanding. Encourage questions and provide clear, concise answers. | - | No | You did not summarize the information at the end of the consultation. Always check understanding and recap key points before ending. |
Interpersonal Skills | Empathy and Reassurance: Validate the patient's feelings and concerns. Reassure the patient about the safety and importance of the screening. Provide support and encouragement throughout the conversation. | 3:14, 6:37 | Partial | You provided some reassurance, but more could have been done to acknowledge concerns about discomfort and anxiety over the test. |
Interpersonal Skills | Signposting: 'I will explain what a pap smear is and why it is important for you.' | - | No | You did not explicitly signpost before explaining the test. Using phrases like 'I’d like to explain what this test is and why it is recommended' would make the conversation smoother. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Disorganised / unstructured consultation – Some sections lacked structure, especially in transitioning to personal questions. | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | Does not recognise the issues or priorities in the consultation – Missed reassurance, safety netting, and full explanation of test results. | ✔️ |
Management | Does not develop a management plan reflecting current best practice – Missed safety netting, follow-up, and leaflets. | ✔️ |
Rapport | Does not appear to develop rapport or show sensitivity for the patient’s feelings and concerns – Could have used more empathy when addressing concerns. | ✔️ |
Listening | Does not make adequate use of verbal & non-verbal cues – Could have picked up on patient’s concerns and offered more reassurance. | ✔️ |
Language | Does not use language or explanations that are relevant and understandable to the patient, including not checking understanding – Overly technical explanations at times and lack of summarization. | ✔️ |
Time | Shows poor time management – Missed follow-up discussion and safety netting, likely due to time constraints. | ✔️ |
Case 16:
Breaking Bad News
RTA in Child Pelvic Fracture
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your performance below:
Scenario Summary:
You are an FY2 doctor in the Paediatrics department. Your patient, Ryan Howard, a 5-year-old child, has been involved in a road traffic accident. An X-ray has revealed an unstable pelvic fracture, and Ryan is currently being prepared for theatre. You need to speak to his mother, Melissa Howard, and address her concerns.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Confirm parent's identity and relationship to Ryan | 2:00 | Yes | You confirmed the parent's identity and relationship early in the conversation, which is good practice. |
Data Gathering | Gather details about the event leading to the injury | 2:35 | Yes | You effectively asked about what happened to Ryan and received a clear response. |
Data Gathering | Confirm any allergies, medications, past medical history, and the last meal Ryan had | 8:42, 8:46, 8:50 | Partial | You asked about allergies, medications, and past hospital admissions, but you missed asking about the last meal Ryan had. It is important to ask about this before surgery as it affects anesthesia safety. |
Management | Explain the need for surgery and the process involved | 3:12 | Yes | You clearly explained why surgery was needed and the process. Good job on making it simple and understandable. |
Management | Discuss potential complications and reassure them about the expertise of the surgical team | 5:12 | Yes | You mentioned blood loss, infection, and scarring, and reassured the parent. This was well done. |
Management | Obtain consent for the surgery and any necessary procedures, including blood transfusions if required | 4:08, 5:33 | Yes | You explained the need for consent and included the possibility of blood transfusion, which is essential. |
Management | Offer leaflets and additional resources about the procedure | - | No | You did not offer any written resources or leaflets. Providing these can help reassure parents and give them something to refer back to later. |
Management | Provide safety netting and follow-up information, assuring them that they will be kept informed throughout the process | 7:25, 7:52 | Partial | You reassured the mother about seeing Ryan after surgery but did not provide clear follow-up information on post-op care or when they will get updates. This would help set expectations and ease parental anxiety. |
Interpersonal Skills | Introduce yourself and state your role clearly | 1:43 | Yes | You introduced yourself and your role well at the beginning, which helps build trust. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use sensitive and empathetic language | 2:43, 3:55 | Partial | You expressed empathy but some phrases sounded rehearsed, e.g., "I know the way you feel, and many people will feel the way you feel too." Try to make empathy sound more natural and personal. |
Interpersonal Skills | Signpost throughout the conversation to ensure clarity | - | No | There was little signposting to guide the conversation. Using phrases like "First, let's discuss what happened, then we'll talk about treatment" would improve clarity. |
Interpersonal Skills | Allow the parents to express their feelings and concerns | 3:36, 5:13 | Yes | You gave space for the parent to express guilt and concerns, which was good. |
Interpersonal Skills | Provide reassurance and empathy, acknowledging their guilt and anxiety | 3:55, 5:16 | Yes | You reassured the mother well when she expressed guilt and worry about Ryan's safety. |
Interpersonal Skills | Offer continuous support and reassurance to the parents | 5:50, 7:52 | Partial | You reassured her during the conversation, but continuous support could have been reinforced by explicitly telling her she can ask further questions or who she can contact for more information. |
Feedback Statement Checklist:
Feedback Statements: | Needs Improvement | |
Consultation | Disorganised / unstructured consultation – Due to lack of signposting, the conversation felt somewhat unstructured. | ✔️ |
Diagnosis | ||
Examination | ||
Findings | ||
Issues | ||
Management | Does not offer sufficient follow-up/safety netting – More clarity was needed on follow-up steps post-surgery. | ✔️ |
Rapport | Does not appear to develop rapport or show sensitivity for the patient’s feelings and concerns, including use of stock phrases – Some responses felt rehearsed rather than natural. | ✔️ |
Listening | ||
Language | ||
Time |




Comments